Trial reportScientific reports2025
The role of physical exercise in enhancing Health, quality of life and joy among older adults.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impacts of Geri-FitHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The current status and implications of aging research from a health perspective.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physical exercise (PE) plays a vital role in promoting health, quality of life (QoL), and well-being in older adults. It helps prevent chronic diseases, improves strength, balance, and cognitive function, and reduces fall risk. Enjoyment and psychological engagement are also essential for long-term adherence. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) study aimed to examine the effects of a 24-week structured sensorimotor training program on physical activity (PA) levels, body composition, quality of life, and enjoyment in older adults. A total of 124 participants (65-80 years old) were allocated to an experimental group (EG, n = 46) or control group (CG, n = 78). The EG engaged in a 24-week supervised sensorimotor training program, while the CG maintained their usual lifestyle. PA levels were assessed using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF); enjoyment of PA was evaluated using the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES); and QoL was measured with the SF-36 questionnaire. Body composition, PA, and QoL were evaluated at baseline and post-intervention. Both groups showed small reductions in body composition measures. The only statistically significant difference was observed in walking activity (minutes per week), with p = 0.022 and partial eta squared (Pη²) = 0.148, favoring the EG. No significant differences were found for overall PA levels, PACES scores, or SF-36 dimensions. Effect sizes for other outcomes ranged from Pη² = 0.001 to 0.148, with p values ranging from 0.022 to 0.78. While the sensorimotor training program was associated with improved walking activity, no significant differences were found for other measured outcomes. The results suggest that moderate PA programs may yield selective benefits in older adults. Further research with longer follow-up and enhanced focus on motivational and psychosocial components is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.