ArticleScientific reports2025
Wearable inertial device for monitoring Parkinson's disease symptoms: a pilot study in a controlled environment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical assessments for Parkinson's disease depend on clinician-administered scales, which have limitations in sensitivity and real-world applicability. Wearable inertial sensors offer a promising approach for objective and continuous monitoring of PD motor symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of a magneto-inertial wearable device in detecting key PD motor manifestations-tremor, akinesia, and dyskinesia-on an individual movement basis. Ten PD patients undergoing pre-surgical evaluation for deep brain stimulation were included in a pilot multicentric study. Participants performed a Levodopa challenge test while wearing an inertial measurement unit on the most affected wrist and ankle. MDS-UPDRS Part III and video recordings were obtained to compare sensor performance to expert evaluations. Algorithms analyzed acceleration and angular velocity data to detect tremor, akinesia and dyskinesia. The sensor demonstrated high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (≥ 93%) for tremor and akinesia detection, with an overall accuracy exceeding 94%. Performance metrics were less promising for dyskinesia detection. Levodopa significantly reduced tremor (p = 0.0247) and increased dyskinesia (p = 0.0169), confirming sensor responsiveness to pharmacological effects. Magneto-inertial wearable device showed promising accuracy for the objective assessment of PD motor symptoms in a controlled environment. These findings support further validation in real-life conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.