ArticleScientific reports2025
SplitWise regression for capturing nonlinear effects in interpretable model selection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- SplitWise regression for capturing nonlinear effects in interpretable model selection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Capturing nonlinear relationships while maintaining interpretability remains a persistent challenge in regression modeling. We introduce SplitWise, a stepwise regression framework that adaptively transforms numeric predictors into threshold-based binary features using shallow decision trees-only when such transformations improve model fit according to the Akaike or Bayesian Information Criterion. This design preserves the transparency of linear models while flexibly capturing threshold-based nonlinear effects, positioning SplitWise between classical linear and interpretable nonlinear regression. SplitWise retains a single, globally linear equation that selectively incorporates data-driven thresholds-yielding models that remain straightforward to interpret and verify. Across synthetic scenarios with nonlinear signal patterns, SplitWise reduced median RMSE by 7-14% relative to the best-performing interpretable linear baseline and improved variable-selection accuracy (median Matthews Correlation Coefficient up to ∼0.79 vs. ∼0.51 for LASSO). On real datasets, SplitWise matched or slightly improved RMSE while selecting fewer predictors. For instance, on Wine Quality (White), it improved RMSE from 0.756 to 0.752 and on Wine Quality (Red) from 0.654 to 0.649, using 6-10 predictors. On Bodyfat, it achieved 3.48-3.49 RMSE with four predictors, comparable to Elastic Net (3.41-3.48 RMSE) but with smaller models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.