ArticleScientific reports2025
Susceptibility assessment of wildfire-induced transmission line tripping using a physical-Bayesian modeling approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The escalating frequency and intensity of wildfires, driven by extreme climate events and anthropogenic activities, pose severe threats to the security and reliability of electrical power systems. Wildfires in proximity to high-voltage transmission lines can lead to a critical reduction in air insulation strength, caused by elevated temperatures, smoke particulate matter, and highly conductive flames. These conditions often precipitate insulation breakdown, line tripping, and potentially widespread power outages. This paper proposes an integrated physical-Bayesian modeling framework for assessing the susceptibility of transmission lines to wildfire-induced tripping. The framework combines a Bayesian network model, which estimates wildfire ignition probability by incorporating geographic, meteorological, fuel, and anthropogenic variables, with a physics-based model that evaluates the risk of insulation failure under wildfire conditions, accounting for both flame bridging and smoke effects. Key influencing features are identified through the Relief algorithm for feature selection. Applied to the Guangdong Power Grid in China, the model identifies distance to settlements, vegetation type, and monthly rainfall as the dominant factors affecting ignition probability. Spatial analysis reveals strong agreement between high-risk zones and historical fire events, and predicted tripping risks are consistent with actual outage records. The approach supports differentiated wildfire prevention strategies and enhances grid resilience, offering a scientifically robust and practical tool for proactive risk management in power systems exposed to wildfire hazards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.