ArticleScientific reports2025
Construction of the prediction model and analysis of key winning factors in world women's volleyball using gradient boosting decision tree.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent advances in the application of artificial intelligence and wearable devices in volleyball.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the key factors contributing to victories in world women's volleyball matches and predict match win rates using machine learning algorithms. Initially, Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) was employed to analyze the fundamental match data of the top six teams over three major world tournaments during the 2020 Olympic cycle (a total of 142 matches, 505 sets, and 27 metrics). The 27 metrics were used as subsequences, and the set win rate served as the parent sequence to identify metrics with a high contribution to match victories. Subsequently, the Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) algorithm was utilized to construct a prediction model for match win rates, using the selected metrics as input features and set win rates as output features. The input metrics were ranked by their contribution to determine the most influential factors on match victories. The results indicate that spike scoring rate, blocking height, excellent defense rate, serve scoring rate, block scoring rate, proportion of serve scores, and proportion of block scores significantly impact match victories. Among these, spike scoring rate and blocking height are decisive, with feature importance values of 0.45 and 0.3, respectively. The constructed GBDT model demonstrated good predictive performance, capable of predicting match win rates. The model parameters are as follows: learning rate (learning-rate) of 0.1, number of trees (n-estimators) of 150, and maximum depth of the tree model (max-depth) of 2. The model's accuracy metrics on the test set are: MSE = 0.002, MAE = 0.0322, R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.