ArticleScientific reports2025
Higher-order sonification of the human brain.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sonification, the process of translating data into sound, has recently gained traction as a tool for both disseminating scientific findings and enabling visually impaired individuals to analyze data. Despite its potential, most current sonification methods remain limited to one-dimensional data, primarily due to the absence of practical, quantitative, and robust techniques for handling multi-dimensional datasets. We analyze structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data of the human brain by integrating two- and three-point statistical measures in Fourier space: the power spectrum and bispectrum. These quantify the spatial correlations of three-dimensional voxel intensity distributions, yielding reduced bispectra that capture higher-order interactions. To illustrate the potential of the approach, we focus on one representative reduced-bispectrum configuration (Q019036) in the OASIS-3 dataset (864 imaging sessions) and provide audio renderings for five age groups (40-50, 50-60, 60-70, 70-80, 80-100 years). As context, prior work with this configuration reported an age-prediction MAE of ≈4.2 years based on neural networks, trained on bispectrum-derived features-not through sonification itself. But here we emphasize sonification rather than predictive benchmarking. Finally, we treat these audio examples as exploratory illustrations rather than a perceptual evaluation. Our results demonstrate that the information loss (e.g., normalized mean squared error) during the reconstruction of the original bispectra, specifically in configurations sensitive to brain aging, from the sonified signal is minimal. Future studies should include systematic statistical inference and perceptual validation to assess the robustness and perceptual utility of the method. Nevertheless, the approach presented here already provides a general framework for encoding multi-dimensional data into time-series-like arrays suitable for sonification, thereby opening new avenues for scientific exploration and improving accessibility for a broader audience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.