ArticleScientific reports2025
Preparation of ZnO/PVA flexible piezoelectric films for sensing dynamic-static superimposed loads under varying temperatures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Flexible thin-film sensors exhibit considerable application potential in the structural health monitoring of bridges under complex traffic scenarios, owing to their capability of rapidly responding to dynamic loads, static loads, and dynamic-static coupled loads. In this study, following the evaporation crystallization method, ZnO/PVA was deposited on the substrate to form a 10-μm-thick film by adjusting the material ratio (m(ZnO):m(PVA) = 4:1) and solution environment (pH = 12). After cutting and packaging, the flexible piezoelectric film sensor was obtained. The sensing characteristics of the ZnO/PVA film sensor under quasi-static, vibratory, and coupled-force loads were analyzed using a dynamic data acquisition system, revealing excellent response feedback in detecting these three stress states. The sensitivity, stability, and response time were 2.34, 0.34, and 12.41 mV/N; 90.6, 94.4, and 92.3%; and 41, 5, and 8 ms, respectively. Temperature-dependent tests (10-60 °C) demonstrated significant signal stability after implementing a curve-fitting compensation algorithm. This temperature correction mechanism addresses the critical challenge of environmental fluctuations in practical bridge monitoring scenarios where static stresses and dynamic vibrations coexist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.