ArticleScientific reports2025
Transfer learning with multiomics integration and deep neural networks reveals drug resistance mechanisms in cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Putting the I in AML: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Cells · 2026Review
- Comprehensive review of publicly accessible databases for gastrointestinal cancer and future challenges in database construction.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Graph neural networks for multi-scale gene-drug interaction modeling in cancer: applications, challenges, and therapeutic opportunities for breast cancer drug resistance.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug resistance remains one of the primary challenges in effective cancer therapy. In this study, we employed a deep neural network (DNN)-based transfer learning (TL) approach to predict drug response and uncover drug resistance mechanisms. We integrated gene expression, somatic mutation, and copy number aberration (CNA) data with drug response profiles using multi-omics integration (MI). We used the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) data for training and incorporated drugs with same pathways into the training models. We then evaluated drug response predictions on independent in-vivo PDX Encyclopedia (PDX) and ex-vivo the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets. In addition, we conducted pathway enrichment analyses to elucidate the mechanisms underlying drug resistance for paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), gemcitabine, and cetuximab. We also applied Fisher's exact test (FET) to assess potential associations between drug resistance and the presence of mutations or CNAs. Our pan-drug models outperformed other methods based on the area under the precision-recall curve (AUCPR). Our pathway enrichment analyses revealed LDHB-mediated pyruvate metabolism and FYN-mediated focal adhesion might have pivotal roles in paclitaxel resistance, while PINK1-mediated mitophagy might be critical in 5-FU resistance. In addition to transcriptional activation, FET suggested that CNAs in LDHB and PINK1 may also be associated with resistance to paclitaxel and 5-FU, respectively. Furthermore, enrichment results for paclitaxel and cetuximab indicated shared resistance mechanisms between the two drugs. Importantly, our findings are consistent with prior experimental studies, providing literature-based validation of our results. Overall, our DNN-based TL approach achieved strong predictive performance across PDX & TCGA datasets and enrichment analyses provided valuable biological insights into drug resistance mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.