ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting plant stress using SAM-L: novel self-adaptive-meta learner with XAI based on soil moisture and chlorophyll analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Explainable Quantile CNN-LSTM model for uncertainty-aware multi-layer soil moisture prediction in tropical cocoa plantations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advancements in precision agriculture have introduced innovative approaches to addressing plant stress, a critical factor influencing crop productivity and agricultural sustainability. Accurate, real-time prediction of plant stress has become essential for optimizing water utilization and promoting healthy crop development. While existing machine learning methods have demonstrated efficacy, they often lack the adaptability required to accommodate the dynamic conditions of agricultural environments. Prior research has identified soil moisture and chlorophyll content as key indicators of plant health and stress, with conventional models relying on simplistic algorithms for stress prediction. However, these models exhibit limitations in scalability, adaptability and interpretability. To overcome these challenges, this study employed sparse additive models with learning (SAM-L) algorithms, integrated with explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), to provide a flexible and transparent solution. In this paper, we proposed a novel framework that integrates SAM-L and XAI to predict plant stress using soil moisture and chlorophyll content. The SAM-L algorithm is a machine learning method that focuses on sparsely selecting relevant features through additive models. It aims to enhance model interpretability while maintaining high prediction accuracy by learning sparse representations of input data. The SAM-L algorithm enhances interpretability while preserving high predictive accuracy by learning sparse feature representations from input data. Additionally, XAI was incorporated to ensure interpretable decision-making, enabling farmers and stakeholders to comprehend the rationale behind irrigation recommendations. The model's architecture incorporates a three-layer Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network to process sequential data effectively. The proposed framework achieved a high performance on publicly available dataset, yielding an overall accuracy of 89.2% on the multi-class classification task. Further analysis of the results across the three predefined stress categories (healthy, moderate stress, and high stress) revealed strong performance, with the model obtaining a macro F1-score of 0.88 and a macro recall of 0.88. The proposed framework not only can enhance prediction accuracy but also can promote sustainable farming practices by reducing water wastage and improving crop resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.