ArticleScientific reports2025
Macroplastic accumulation across different surface covers, a case study of two South African rivers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-driven estimation of microplastic percentage yield for rapid and accurate quantification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Perceptions of plastic pollution among inland fishery stakeholders in a subtropical reservoir.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plastic pollution in freshwater ecosystems is an escalating global concern, yet riverine macroplastic pollution and dynamics remain poorly understood in Southern Africa. This study investigated macroplastic accumulation across different surface covers in two rivers with contrasting anthropogenic inputs. We hypothesised that wood jams in the current study would contribute to high macroplastic loads across Bloukrans and Palmiet rivers and that the polymer composition of plastics would be diverse across all four surface covers. A total of 452 macroplastic items were collected, with significantly higher loads recorded in the Bloukrans River (3.5 items/m2; 93.3 g/m2) compared to the Palmiet River (0.8 items/m2; 10.1 g/m2). Multilayer plastics and soft polyolefins dominated across both rivers, particularly in herbaceous vegetation and wood jams. Significant differences were observed in macroplastic loads between rivers and among surface covers for Palmiet River. The increased macroplastic loads in the Bloukrans River were associated with untreated municipal effluent, stormwater runoff, and informal waste dumping, while in Palmiet River, macroplastic pollution was mainly linked to recreational littering and runoff. Wood jams emerged as an effective hotspot for macroplastic debris. These findings highlight the critical role of surface cover in enabling macroplastic accumulation and distribution thus the study further calls for targeted waste management, cleanup operations, and riparian protection strategies to safeguard river health and resilience in Southern Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.