ArticleScientific reports2025
A mechanistic approach for intracranial pressure (ICP) level estimation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Left Pulvinar Thalamic Tumor with Ventricular Atrial Extension Presenting as Network-Level Cognitive and Gait Dysfunction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Abnormally increased intracranial pressure (ICP) requires clinical diagnosis before management; however, the only conclusive methods are invasive. In this study, we propose a non-invasive method to estimate ICP level using readily available MRI measurements. We used a mechanistic model of intracranial pulsatility, incorporating brain solid mechanics, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow dynamics. The model was personalised from brain displacement and blood/CSF data, to estimate ICP level using a harmonic balance method for efficiency. The efficiency of the method was demonstrated using synthetic data with a relative ICP level estimate error of less than 0.4% and speed-up of more than six times compared to classical optimisation methods. Moreover, the method showed robustness to high levels of noise as well as spatial and temporal resolutions. This study shows the potential of this method as a high-fidelity and non-invasive approach to estimate the ICP level. This non-invasive ICP level estimation method facilitates low-risk, cost-effective diagnosis of ICP-related pathologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.