ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting human tactile smoothness/roughness perception from multidimensional mechanical properties of synthetic fibers using machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Experimental Analysis of the Effects of Image Lightness and Chroma Modulation on the Reproduction of Glossiness, Transparency and Roughness.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Quantifying and modeling fabric surface roughness discrepancy: Consistency between physical and digital textures in online shopping.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurately predicting human perception of tactile roughness remains challenging because previous models often used limited mechanical properties, small sample sizes, and insufficient validation methods. To address these limitations, we developed a predictive model integrating multidimensional mechanical properties and subjective evaluations of tactile perception, using 50 commercially available synthetic fiber samples, including polyester, spandex, nylon, and their blends. Twelve mechanical properties were measured across four categories: geometric roughness, frictional force, hardness, and tensile strength. Tactile perception of smoothness/roughness was evaluated by 37 participants using a 5-point scale, with lower values indicating smoother textures and higher values indicating rougher textures. Correlation analysis identified kinetic friction coefficient (KF, ρ = -0.67), arithmetic mean roughness (Ra, ρ = 0.44), mean width of profile elements (RSm, ρ = 0.42), maximum load (ML, ρ = -0.41), and root mean square slope (Rdq, ρ = 0.31) as key predictors. Among six regression models, Gaussian process regression showed the highest predictive accuracy (cross-validated R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.