ArticleNature communications2025
Highly efficient current-induced domain wall motion in a room temperature van der Waals magnet.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Room-Temperature Skyrmionic Synapse in 2D Ferromagnet FeAdvanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Nanoelectronics with Two-Dimensional Magnets.Nano letters · 2026Review
- Real-space imaging and control of topological spin textures in a van der Waals antiferromagnet.Nature communications · 2026Article
- The anatomy of magnetic field pulse induced transverse domain wall dynamics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Two-dimensional van der Waals magnets are highly promising for next-generation spintronics. The ferromagnetic material Fe
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.