ArticleScientific reports2025
Mine drainage leads to the reshaping of the spatial patterns of soil extracellular econzymatic stoichiometry and microbial resource limitation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Soil enzyme dynamics under PFAS contamination in arid and Mediterranean soils.NPJ emerging contaminants · 2026Article
- Editorial: Microbial diversity in mine drainage.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Global environmental changes have brought significant attention to the ecological problems caused by mine drainage. Mine drainage alters the physicochemical properties of soil, which can, in turn, influence its ecological function. However, the impact of mine drainage on soil ecoenzymatic carbon-nitrogen-phosphorus (C-N-P) stoichiometry and the spatial distribution of microbial resource limitations(i.e., carbon, nitrogen, or phosphorus limitation) across various soil depths and distances from discharge points is not well understood. Therefore, we investigated the variations in physicochemical properties, microbial biomass, extracellular enzyme activities, and ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of soils at varying distances and depths surrounding mine water discharge areas. Furthermore, microbial resource limitations were measured through vector analysis of ecoenzymatic stoichiometry. The results showed that mine drainage significantly enhanced soil extracellular enzyme activity. While the discharge had no substantial impact on ecoenzymatic stoichiometry across different distances, significant changes were observed at various soil depths. Specifically, ecoenzymatic stoichiometry decreased consistently with increasing soil depth. spatial distribution of microbial resource limitations in the study area were predominantly phosphorus-limited, with P limitation intensifying with greater soil depth. Overall, these findings improve our knowledge of how mine drainage influences soil ecoenzymatic stoichiometry and the spatial distribution of microbial resource constraints, providing insights for future ecological management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.