ArticleNature communications2025
Lifting regenerative barriers promotes epithelial cell fate plasticity supporting lineage conversion.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability of adult epithelial cells to rewire their cell fate programme in response to injury has emerged as a new paradigm in stem cell biology. This plasticity supersedes the concept of strict stem cell hierarchies, granting cells access to a wider repertoire of fate choices. Yet, in order to prevent a disordered cellular response, this process must be finely regulated. Here we investigate the little-known regulatory processes that restrict fate permissibility in adult cells, and keep plasticity in check. Using a 3D regenerative culture system, that enables co-culturing epithelium and stroma of different origins, we demonstrate that oesophageal cells exposed to the ectopic signals of the dermis are capable of switching their identity towards skin. Lineage tracing experiments and histological analysis, however, reveal that the oesophageal-to-skin lineage conversion process is highly inefficient, pointing to the existence of barriers limiting cell fate re-specification. Single-cell RNA sequencing capturing the temporality of this process shows that cells transitioning towards skin identity resist the natural progression towards tissue maturation by remaining in a persistent regenerative state marked by a particularly strong hypoxic signature. Gain and loss of function experiments demonstrate that the HIF1a-SOX9 axis acts as a key modulator of epithelial cell fate plasticity, restricting changes in identity during tissue regeneration. Taken together, our results reveal the existence of lineage conversion barriers that must be resolved for cells to respond to signals instructing alternative fate choices, shedding light on the principles underlying the full regenerative capacity of adult epithelial cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.