ArticleClinical endoscopy2025
The feasibility and safety of trans-colorectal endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: a retrospective study of Japan.
Article in Clinical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is an effective diagnostic technique; however, few studies have evaluated the efficacy of trans-colorectal EUS-FNA. This study assessed the feasibility of trans-colorectal EUS-FNA.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 76 consecutive patients who underwent trans-colorectal EUS-FNA for pelvic lesions between January 2013 and September 2023.
resultsA total of 76 pelvic lesions were identified. The median number of EUS-FNA punctures was 3 (1-8). The median lesion size was 18.9 (8.2-100.0) mm. The success rate was 98.7% (75/76), with no reported adverse events. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of EUS-FNA were 94.3% (50/53), 100% (22/22), 100% (50/50), 88.0% (22/25), and 96.0% (72/75), respectively. Malignancy was initially suspected in 65 patients before EUS-FNA; however, 25 patients showed benign results. Of these, three were later reexamined and diagnosed with malignancy, three underwent surgery and were found to have benign pathology, and 19 avoided unnecessary surgery.
conclusionsTrans-colorectal EUS-FNA is a safe and effective diagnostic procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.