ArticleClinical endoscopy2025
Effect of double-layered suturing for mucosal defect closure after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection on postoperative adverse events: a propensity score-matched retrospective study in Japan.
Article in Clinical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endoscopic Closure After Colorectal ESD: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis on Its Efficacy in Preventing Adverse Events.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection defect closure: promising but still evolving.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProphylactic closure of mucosal defects after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) can reduce the incidence of postoperative adverse events. However, data on this notion are limited. This study retrospectively evaluated the effect of closure using a double-layered suturing technique on postoperative adverse events.
methodsA total of 370 lesions in 317 patients who underwent colorectal ESD were included in this analysis. Patients with 197 lesions that were completely closed were then assigned to the closure group. Patients with 173 lesions, including 55 that were partially closed and 118 that were not closed, were assigned to the non-closure group. Propensity score matching was performed, and 136 lesions were selected for each group.
resultsThe closure group had a significantly lower overall incidence rate of postoperative adverse events, including delayed bleeding, delayed perforation, and post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome, than the non-closure group (2.2% vs. 9.6%, p=0.018). The closure group had a significantly lower incidence of abdominal pain on the day after ESD than the non-closure group (2.9% vs. 11.0%, p=0.015).
conclusionsProphylactic closure of mucosal defects after colorectal ESD using a double-layered suturing technique could prevent postoperative adverse events and abdominal pain on the day after ESD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.