ArticleBMJ open2025
Association between exposure to proton pump inhibitors and hypertension: a descriptive and disproportionality analysis of VigiBase.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe potential link between proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and hypertension remains unclear. It is uncertain whether such an association exists, whether it represents a class-of-PPI effect and whether a dose-response relationship is involved. This study aimed to investigate the potential class-of-PPI effect associating PPIs with hypertension reporting and evaluate whether the association follows a dose-dependent pattern.
designA disproportionality analysis was conducted within VigiBase to identify signals of hypertension reporting associated with individual PPIs by calculating adjusted reporting ORs (aRORs) within a multivariate case/non-case study design. Additionally, the presence of a dose-response relationship was explored.
settingReal-world data from VigiBase, the WHO pharmacovigilance database, was used.
participantsAll individual case safety reports with PPI use were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: Incident hypertension cases were identified using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities V.26.1 related to at least one PPI administration that were systematically collected until 28 October 2024. Pharmacovigilance signals between the use of PPIs and hypertension reported and dose dependence between PPI posology and onset or worsening hypertension were analysed.
resultsThe database contained 26 587 reports of PPI-associated hypertension (2.3%), predominantly among women (63.3%). Hypertension was most frequently reported in the group aged 45-64 years (41.4%). A significant reporting OR (ROR) was observed for almost all PPIs in both univariable (RORs, 1.32-1.97) and multivariate analyses (aRORs, 1.09-1.35) after adjustments for age group, sex, concurrent antihypertensive medication and drugs known to induce hypertension, with the exception of lansoprazole (aROR 0.99, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.03). A potential trend suggestive of a dose-response relationship was identified, with doses lower than the median associated with a lower aROR for hypertension than doses higher than the median for all PPIs. However, this trend was not statistically significant, potentially due to insufficient statistical power.
conclusionsThis investigation indicates a notable pharmacovigilance safety signal associating PPI usage with hypertension reporting. Although a potential dose-response trend was observed, it was not statistically significant, possibly due to limited statistical power. Further longitudinal studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.