Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41309467›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Use of physioLogy to evaluaTe procedural Result After percutaneous coronary intervention of Chronic Total Occlusion (ULTRA-CTO): protocol for a prospective, single-arm, multicentre, exploratory study.

Alexander M Griffioen, Thomas A Meijers, Vincent Roolvink, Dirk J van der Heijden, Rick H J A Volleberg, Marleen van Wely, Niels van Royen, Robert-Jan van Geuns, Maarten van Leeuwen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04780971 (Use of Physiology to Evaluate Procedural Result After PCI CTO), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04780971 narecruitingnot on this map

Use of Physiology to Evaluate Procedural Result After PCI CTO

TypeinterventionalSponsorIsalaRan2021 to 2026Enrolled200ConditionsPercutaneous Coronary Revascularisation, Complex Coronary LesionArmspost-PCI Pd/Pa
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alexander M GriffioenCardiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7110-2934
Thomas A MeijersCardiology, Isala Hospitals, Zwolle, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4298-1607
Vincent RoolvinkCardiology, Isala Hospitals, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Dirk J van der HeijdenCardiology, Isala Hospitals, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Rick H J A VollebergCardiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marleen van WelyCardiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Niels van RoyenCardiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6136-8640
Robert-Jan van GeunsCardiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Maarten van LeeuwenCardiology, Isala Hospitals, Zwolle, The Netherlands m.a.h.van.leeuwen@isala.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4264-4280

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPost-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) is associated with future major adverse cardiac events and may reflect residual ischaemia and suboptimal stent result (SSR). Post-PCI FFR should therefore be considered to identify patients at high risk. Whether abnormal post-PCI FFR and non-hyperaemic pressure ratios, including resting full-cycle ratio (RFR), represent SSR after PCI remains to be determined, especially after chronic total occlusion (CTO) PCI. In addition, little is known about the association between post-PCI intracoronary physiology and SSR with residual anginal complaints. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The physioLogy to evaluaTe procedural Result After percutaneous coronary intervention of Chronic Total Occlusion study is a prospective, multicentre, exploratory, mechanistic, investigator-initiated, single-arm study with a non-inferiority design. A total of 200 patients, undergoing CTO PCI, with FFR and RFR measured in all patients, will be included at two study sites in the Netherlands. The primary endpoint is the area under the curve (AUC) of post-PCI RFR, in comparison to the AUC of post-PCI FFR, for prediction of optical coherence tomography-detected SSR and its individual components. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by the local ethical review board ('Medisch Ethische Toetsing Commissie Isala Zwolle'). Written informed consent will be obtained from all patients before enrolment. The outcomes of this study are intended to be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal. STUDY REGISTRATION: NCT04780971.

Indexed as

Coronary OcclusionFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialPercutaneous Coronary InterventionChronic DiseaseEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicNetherlandsProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCoronary heart diseaseCoronary interventionIschaemic heart disease

Identifiers

PMID41309467
PMCPMC12666185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.