Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41309458›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

What are the core features of stroke care that support well-being? A qualitative study from the perspectives of people with stroke, whānau and stroke care providers in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Felicity Bright, Claire Ibell-Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Felicity BrightPerson Centred Rehabilitation Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand felicity.bright@aut.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8522-8287
Claire Ibell-RobertsPerson Centred Rehabilitation Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo identify the core attributes of quality care that supports well-being from the perspectives of those who access and provide stroke services.

designQualitative Interpretive Description study design involving in-depth semistructured individual and group interviews and analysis using journey mapping and conventional content analysis.

participants24 people with stroke, 13 family/whānau members and 34 healthcare professionals located throughout New Zealand.

settingParticipants were recruited through health services, stroke support organisations and professional networks. Interviews were completed in person at people's homes or workplaces or on an online videoconference.

resultsAnalysis generated a quality framework of domains. High-quality care that supports well-being after stroke in Aotearoa: supports people through uncertainty; fosters a sense of belonging; prioritises relationships and connecting 'as people'; attends to the emotional aspects of stroke; centres people's preferences and supports people to have choice and control; honours Māori knowledges and practices; responds to the strengths and needs of friends and whānau; and attends to people's holistic long-term well-being.

conclusionsThis study offers a framework for considering holistic stroke care that supports areas of need not consistently addressed in stroke services. This framework can help structure practice and policy and can underpin future research in well-being.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelHealth Services, IndigenousQuality of Health CareStrokeAdultAgedFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandQualitative ResearchSocial SupportMENTAL HEALTHQUALITATIVE RESEARCHQuality of LifeStroke

Identifiers

PMID41309458
PMCPMC12666068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.