ArticleThe Lancet. Digital health2025
Performance of universal and stratified computer-aided detection thresholds for chest x-ray-based tuberculosis screening: a cross-sectional, diagnostic accuracy study.
Article in The Lancet. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of medical imaging in translational research into early pulmonary tuberculosis.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2026Review
- Performance of Human and Computer-aided Evaluation of Digital Chest Radiography for Community-based Screening of Asymptomatic Tuberculosis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundComputer-aided detection (CAD) software analyses chest x-rays for features suggestive of tuberculosis and provides a numeric abnormality score. However, estimates of CAD accuracy for tuberculosis screening are hindered by the scarcity of confirmatory data among people with lower x-ray scores, including those without symptoms. Additionally, the appropriate x-ray score thresholds for obtaining further testing might vary according to population and client characteristics. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of CAD among all screened individuals and assess whether stratifying CAD thresholds by age and sex could improve performance.
methodsIn this cross-sectional, diagnostic accuracy study, we screened for tuberculosis in individuals aged 15 years and older in Uganda using portable chest x-rays with CAD (qXR version 3.2). Participants not on active tuberculosis treatment were offered screening regardless of their symptoms. We included data from all participants from both facility-based and community-based sites who were screened from June 1, 2022 (study start), to March 31, 2024. Individuals with x-ray scores above a threshold of 0·1 (range 0-1) were asked to provide sputum for Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert) testing. We estimated the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve [AUC]) of CAD for detecting Xpert-positive tuberculosis when using the same threshold for all individuals (under different assumptions about tuberculosis prevalence among people with x-ray scores <0·1), and compared this estimate with approaches stratified by age, sex, or both.
findings54 840 individuals were assessed for eligibility, 52 835 of whom were screened for tuberculosis using CAD. The median age was 38 years (IQR 26-50), 23 586 (44·6%) participants were male, and 29 249 (55·4%) were female. 8949 (16·9%) had x-ray scores of 0·1 or more. Of 7219 participants with valid Xpert results, 382 (5·3%) were Xpert-positive, including 81 with trace results. Assuming 0·1% of participants with x-ray scores less than 0·1 would have been Xpert-positive if tested, qXR had an estimated AUC of 0·92 (95% CI 0·90-0·94) for Xpert-positive tuberculosis. Stratifying x-ray score thresholds according to age and sex improved accuracy; for example, at 96·1% (95% CI 95·9-96·3) specificity, estimated sensitivity was 75·0% (69·9-79·5) for a universal threshold (of ≥0·65) versus 76·9% (71·9-81·2) for thresholds stratified by age and sex (p=0·046).
interpretationOur findings suggest that the accuracy of CAD for tuberculosis screening among all screening participants, including those without symptoms or abnormal chest x-rays, is higher than previously estimated. Stratifying x-ray score thresholds based on client characteristics such as age and sex could further improve accuracy, enabling a more effective and personalised approach to tuberculosis screening.
fundingNational Institutes of Health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.