ArticleBMJ global health2025
Community co-design of contextually relevant rheumatic heart disease primary prevention.
Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPrimary prevention of rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is aimed at timely diagnosis and treatment of superficial Group A Streptococcal infections, most commonly Strep sore throat. However, uptake and delivery of primary prevention for RHD-endemic regions has room for improvement. Community co-design is an important aspect of intervention development to increase sustainability and reach.
methodsGroup-level assessment (GLA) sessions were used to understand the community's priorities and insights around sore throat. Personas, or user archetypes, were then developed to capture the behaviours and characteristics of diverse future users of primary prevention in the district. Finally, these personas were used in community design workshops to identify barriers and facilitators to potential interventions, generate creative solutions to overcome identified barriers and prioritise implementation models based on impact and feasibility. The final list of implementation strategies was presented by workshop participants to the broader community for additional validation and feedback.
resultsThe GLA sessions identified five priority areas: (1) need for improved access to care, closer to home; (2) importance of mothers as caregivers; (3) strong influence of community leaders; (4) importance of community health workers and (5) role of traditional providers and practices. Five personas were created, including: hands-on caregiver, restricted caregiver, removed family decision-maker, helpful neighbour and influential leader. Design workshops identified the highest-rated interventions as: decentralisation of care delivery into the community (strategy 1), use of community health workers as key implementing partners (strategy 2) and streamlining sore throat services at public healthcare facilities (strategy 3). Participants proposed potential practical applications of these interventions.
conclusionsCommunity-based participatory research identified novel implementation strategies for an RHD primary prevention programme in Uganda. The value set and strategies developed in this study can now be used as guideposts to develop and test a package of implementation strategies for improving RHD primary prevention in Uganda.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.