ArticleNeuroImage2026
Time-resolved functional connectivity during visuomotor graph learning.
Article in NeuroImage, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans naturally attend to patterns that emerge in our perceptual environments, building mental models that allow future experiences to be processed more effectively and efficiently. Statistical learning research shows that people extract structure from stimuli even when it is not explicitly observable. A growing line of work formalizes this implicit structure as graphs in which perceptual events correspond to nodes and statistical transitions to edges, revealing that behavior is sensitive to underlying graph topology. Yet little is known about how different topologies shape the neural dynamics of learning itself. Here, we used time-resolved network analyses of fMRI data collected during a visuomotor graph-learning task in which stimuli were presented according to random walks on either a modular or lattice graph. Participants responded faster to modular graphs early in learning, though this advantage diminished over runs, replicating prior behavioral findings. Neurally, task performance was characterized by a flexible visual system, relatively stable large-scale community structure, and increased cohesiveness (or within-system recruitment) of the dorsal attention, limbic, default-mode, and subcortical systems. Across runs, integration between visual and ventral-attention regions increased, while coupling between frontoparietal control and visual/dorsal-attention regions decreased-signaling a shift from top-down to bottom-up processing as learning progressed. These results show that the brain's dynamic functional organization reflects the statistical topology of experience: stronger integration among limbic, default-mode, temporoparietal, and subcortical systems predicted faster responses for modular but not lattice graphs. By linking behavioral sensitivity to graph structure with its time-resolved neural correlates, this work advances understanding of how the brain represents and adapts to complex statistical environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.