Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41308298›Full record

ArticleDrug testing and analysis2026

Improvement of EPO Transgene Detection From Polymeric Dried Blood Spots for Antidoping Application.

Alexandre Marchand, Ingrid Roulland, Magnus Ericsson

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug testing and analysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexandre MarchandLaboratoire Antidopage Français (LADF), Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2670-6939
Ingrid RoullandLaboratoire Antidopage Français (LADF), Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
Magnus EricssonLaboratoire Antidopage Français (LADF), Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the past couple of years, black market products have appeared and were confirmed to contain genetic products coding for human erythropoietin (EPO). While being prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA), they could be used to produce endogenously more EPO hormone and hence increase performance. In a previous work, we demonstrated the potential of 20-μL dried blood spots (DBS) to detect the presence of EPO transgene in human blood down to 250 copies (12,500 copies/mL), despite lower sensitivity (30-fold) than in 1-mL fresh blood. As the use of DBS as a collection matrix for antidoping is going to expand in the near future, our aim was to develop and validate a new protocol to improve the sensitivity of gene doping detection from DBS. Three DBS devices were evaluated: polymeric Tasso-M20 (TASSO Inc.) and Mitra (Neoteryx), and cellulosic Protein Saver 903 (Whatman). The best results were achieved with polymeric DBS, and a full validation was performed for the detection of the EPO transgene using Tasso M-20 DBS; 1500 copies/mL were detected in 50% of cases and robust detection was obtained at 5000 copies/mL (100 copies transgene in 20-μL DBS) with the four spots of the Tasso device tested over several weeks. The results confirm that polymeric DBS can be used as an alternative to fresh blood for gene doping detection with high sensitivity simplifying also potential reanalysis in the future.

Indexed as

Doping in SportsDried Blood Spot TestingErythropoietinSubstance Abuse DetectionTransgenesHumansLimit of DetectionPolymersEPO protein, humanErythropoietinPolymersDBSEPO transgenegene dopingreal‐time PCR

Identifiers

PMID41308298
PMCPMC12861599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.