Trial reportJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2025
A Holistic Nursing Programme Based on 24 h Holter Monitoring for Coronary Angiography Patients in the Perioperative Period.
Trial report in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Holistic Nursing Programme Based on 24 h Holter Monitoring for Coronary Angiography Patients in the Perioperative Period.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study developed, implemented, and evaluated the effectiveness of a holistic nursing program based on 24 h Holter monitoring for patients undergoing coronary angiography, aiming to improve nursing quality and reduce the incidence of coronary complications during the perioperative period.
methodsEighty patients who underwent coronary angiography from Jan 2023 to Dec 2023 were randomly divided into a study group and a control group. The control group received routine care, while the experimental group received targeted holistic care based on dynamic electrocardiogram monitoring.
resultsThe score of nursing quality in the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group (p ＜ 0.05), and the incidence of complications in the experimental group was significantly lower than the control group (P ＜ 0.05). the two groups were comparable.
conclusionThe overall nursing based on 24 h dynamic electrocardiogram monitoring can significantly improve the nursing quality of coronary angiography and reduce the occurrence of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.