Trial reportClinical rehabilitation2026
Does radial shockwave therapy lead to immediate improvements in pain in people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy? A randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in Clinical rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectivesTo investigate the immediate effects of radial shockwave therapy versus sham on movement evoked pain in people with insertional Achilles tendinopathy.DesignRandomised controlled trial.SettingPrivate clinic.ParticipantsPeople diagnosed with insertional Achilles tendinopathy who were over 18 years old with a symptom duration of greater than 3 months.InterventionSeventy-six participants (53% female, mean age 51 years) were randomly allocated to a radial shockwave (n = 38) or sham (n = 38) group. Three sessions of radial shockwave or sham (no pressure) to the most affected side in 5-to-10-day intervals. All participants received identical education and exercises.Main measuresThe primary outcome measure was movement evoked pain (measured on a 100 mm visual analogue scale) at the first, second and third session immediately after each application.ResultsThere was 96% follow up of participants at the third session. Over half of the participants believed they were receiving the 'real' treatment (average 58%). The mean movement evoked pain scores improved each session by 0.6 points for the radial shockwave therapy and 0.7 points for the sham group. There was no difference between the groups after the first (-0.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.6 to 0.8), second (0.4, 95% CI -0.8 to 1.6) or third session (-0.4, 95% CI -1.6 to 0.8).ConclusionsIn adults with insertional Achilles tendinopathy, radial shockwave therapy demonstrated no more efficacy than a sham in reducing immediate movement evoked pain. These results do not support the use of radial shockwave therapy for immediate pain relief among people with this condition.Clinical trial registrationACTRN12620000035921.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.