ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2026
Acute and Long-Term Healthcare Utilization and Expenditures for Serious Bacterial Infections among Newborns in US Hospitals.
Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSerious bacterial infections among newborns are associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and economic costs. While most newborns fully recover following the acute phase of illness, some develop long-term complications that require medical care. The objective of this real-world study was to estimate acute and long-term healthcare utilization and expenditures among US newborns with bacterial meningitis or sepsis during their birth hospitalization.
methodsA retrospective matched-cohort design and a US healthcare claims database were employed. Study population comprised newborns who, during their birth hospitalization, had evidence of meningitis or sepsis due to a bacterial pathogen and matched comparison newborns. Study measures included all-cause healthcare utilization and expenditures during the birth hospitalization as well as the 1-year period following discharge.
resultsAmong newborns with bacterial meningitis (N = 678), 61% were born prematurely, 27% had low birthweight, and 56% had ≥ 1 high-risk condition; among those with bacterial sepsis (N = 33,478), corresponding values were 48%, 20%, and 33%. During the birth hospitalization, utilization and expenditures were higher (versus comparators) among newborns with meningitis (hospital days, 37 versus 23; intensive care unit [ICU], 97% versus 64%; expenditures, US $423,390 versus $168,861) and sepsis (hospital days, 18 versus 14; ICU, 93% versus 52%; expenditures, $139,973 versus $78,549). Mean levels during the 1-year follow-up period were also markedly higher (versus comparators) among newborns with meningitis (expenditures: by $218,464) or sepsis (expenditures: by $39,259).
conclusionsSerious bacterial infections among newborns place a substantial burden on the US healthcare system for the treatment of acute illness as well as long-term complications. Interventions targeting the prevention of newborn bacterial infections have the potential to yield significant resource utilization and cost offsets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.