ArticleDiscover oncology2025
A novel inositol phosphate metabolism signature predicts survival prognosis in low grade glioma.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Low grade gliomas (LGGs) are heterogeneous tumors with high recurrence rates and variable clinical outcomes. However, metabolic dysregulation within LGG and its prognosis and tumor pathology remain poorly understood. We investigated the significance of inositol phosphate metabolism (IPM) in LGG and constructed an integrated machine learning survival model to improve the prognostic accuracy. By examining the transcriptomic data of LGGs, we identified a prognostic IPM (pIPM) signature consisting of 33 genes, with PLCG1 and MTMR3 showing the highest and lowest hazard ratios, respectively. Subsequent consensus clustering analysis revealed two distinct clusters (C1 and C2) with different pIPM expression levels and overall survival outcomes. Furthermore, IPM pathway analysis revealed an overall poor prognosis except for MGAT4C, suggesting that IPM plays a key role in driving LGG progression. Using machine learning algorithms, we developed and validated a robust survival model based on pIPM, in which Lasso model showed excellent discriminative power and reliability on both training and validation datasets. Furthermore, an increased IPM risk score was associated with increased cell proliferation and inflammation. Remarkably, the score was linked to treatment response, tumor recurrence, and remodeling of the immune microenvironment, emphasizing its potential as both a prognostic biomarker and a therapeutic target for LGG. In conclusion, our findings revealed a complex involvement of phosphatidylinositol metabolism in the LGG pathogenesis and elucidated its clinical significance for prognostic prediction and therapeutic intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.