ArticleForensic toxicology2026
Deadly confusion of novel psychoactive substances: fatal outcome of ADB-BUTINACA mislabeled as 3',4'-methylenedioxy-α-pyrrolidinohexiophenone.
Article in Forensic toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phase I Metabolism of Novel Phencyclidine Derivative 3-Cl-PCP: In Vitro Studies With Pooled Human Liver Microsomes and Investigation of a Post-Mortem Case.Drug testing and analysis · 2026Article
- Entomological consequences and toxicological detection of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) in necrophagous larvae (Diptera: Calliphoridae).International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive HPLC-HRMS/MS Targeted Screening Method to Detect 90 New Psychoactive Substances in Oral Fluid Samples.Biology · 2026Article
- Synthetic cannabinoids in human post-mortem samples - ADB-BUTINACA and metabolites in three fatalities.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA powder found at a fatality scene, labeled as the synthetic cathinone 3',4'-methylenedioxy-α-pyrrolidinohexiophenone (MDPHP) and most likely smoked using a crack pipe, was analyzed. The powder was identified as very potent synthetic cannabinoid ADB-BUTINACA/ADB-BINACA with a high purity (> 98%). This case highlights the risks associated with mislabeled novel psychoactive substances (NPS), particularly those purchased online.
methodsThe powder was analyzed using liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS), liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Comprehensive toxicological screening, including NPS, was performed in urine and blood. ADB-BUTINACA was quantified using a standard addition method on various post-mortem matrices: femoral and heart blood, urine, stomach content, bile fluid and liver tissue. Scalp hair was analyzed via external calibration to assess potential long-term exposure.
resultsADB-BUTINACA concentrations were 34.5 ng/mL in femoral blood, 101 ng/mL in heart blood and 3.1 ng/mL in urine. Traces of MDMB-BUTINACA were found in the powder and hair, but not in other biological matrices. ADB-BUTINACA metabolites were detected in all biological matrices. MDPHP was found at low concentrations (< 2 ng/mL) in blood and urine but not in the powder, indicating prior cathinone use. A toxicological significance score (TSS) of 3 was assigned for this monointoxication with ADB-BUTINACA.
conclusionsThis case demonstrates fatal poisoning due to extremely high ADB-BUTINACA concentrations in post-mortem blood samples, emphasizing the severe risks associated with mislabeled substances. It underscores the importance of drug checking services to prevent poisonings and overdoses caused by highly potent NPS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.