ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2025
Current State of Artificial Intelligence in Assessing Cardiac Function.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Echo Chambers: Bias and Representation in Cardiac Imaging Datasets for Artificial Intelligence.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Cardiac imaging in Chagas cardiomyopathy for phenotypic characterisation and risk stratification.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Calculation of Ejection Fraction Using Cardiac Computed Tomography: Clinical Evolution, Reliability, and Technological Challenges-A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewAccurate, timely quantification of cardiac function is central to the diagnosis, management, and monitoring of cardiovascular disease. This review synthesizes recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) applications across the major data modalities used in cardiovascular medicine, spanning electrocardiography (ECG), echocardiography, cardiac CT/MRI, and clinical text in electronic health records (EHR). RECENT
findingsState-of-the-art deep learning algorithms now enable highly accurate assessment of cardiac disease across a range of modalities. These models excel in detecting subclinical cardiovascular disease, occult disease etiologies, and ventricular dysfunction that may elude conventional interpretation. Recent randomized controlled trials demonstrate that AI models can match or even outperform clinicians in identifying myocardial infarction from ECGs, occult atrial fibrillation from sinus rhythm ECGs, and in quantifying left ventricular ejection fraction from echocardiography. Concurrently, the emergence of foundation models and multimodal architectures is accelerating label-efficient learning, enabling automated report generation, and facilitating scalable population-level screening across diverse clinical settings. AI is poised to transition from proof-of-concept to indispensable clinical partner in cardiology. Robust multicenter validation, open-source code transparency, and prospective trials are essential to confirm generalizability and to quantify patient-level benefit. As foundation models mature and multimodal learning becomes routine, AI will enable scalable screening, precision phenotyping, and more equitable cardiovascular care-particularly in resource-limited settings-while allowing clinicians to refocus on patient-centered practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41307845What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.