Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41307845›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2025

Current State of Artificial Intelligence in Assessing Cardiac Function.

Victoria Yuan, Keane Lee, Andrew P Ambrosy, David Ouyang, Hirotaka Ieki

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Victoria YuanDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.
Keane LeeDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton, CA, USA.
Andrew P AmbrosyDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton, CA, USA.
David OuyangDepartment of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Hirotaka IekiDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton, CA, USA. hieki@stanford.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAccurate, timely quantification of cardiac function is central to the diagnosis, management, and monitoring of cardiovascular disease. This review synthesizes recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) applications across the major data modalities used in cardiovascular medicine, spanning electrocardiography (ECG), echocardiography, cardiac CT/MRI, and clinical text in electronic health records (EHR). RECENT

findingsState-of-the-art deep learning algorithms now enable highly accurate assessment of cardiac disease across a range of modalities. These models excel in detecting subclinical cardiovascular disease, occult disease etiologies, and ventricular dysfunction that may elude conventional interpretation. Recent randomized controlled trials demonstrate that AI models can match or even outperform clinicians in identifying myocardial infarction from ECGs, occult atrial fibrillation from sinus rhythm ECGs, and in quantifying left ventricular ejection fraction from echocardiography. Concurrently, the emergence of foundation models and multimodal architectures is accelerating label-efficient learning, enabling automated report generation, and facilitating scalable population-level screening across diverse clinical settings. AI is poised to transition from proof-of-concept to indispensable clinical partner in cardiology. Robust multicenter validation, open-source code transparency, and prospective trials are essential to confirm generalizability and to quantify patient-level benefit. As foundation models mature and multimodal learning becomes routine, AI will enable scalable screening, precision phenotyping, and more equitable cardiovascular care-particularly in resource-limited settings-while allowing clinicians to refocus on patient-centered practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCardiovascular DiseasesDeep LearningEchocardiographyElectrocardiographyElectronic Health RecordsHumansArtificial intelligenceAutomated diagnosisDeep learningFoundation modelMachine learningTransthoracic echocardiography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.