Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41307827›Full record

ReviewAMB Express2025

Advances and challenges in the integration of artificial intelligence in microbial biosurfactant bioprocess.

Vaibhav Kadam, Sheetal Kusal, Shruti Patil, Pooja Singh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AMB Express, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vaibhav KadamSymbiosis Centre for Waste Resource Management, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Lavale, Pune, India.
Sheetal KusalSymbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Lavale, Pune, India.
Shruti PatilSymbiosis Institute of Technology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Lavale, Pune, India. shruti.patil@sitpune.edu.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4903-1540
Pooja SinghSymbiosis Centre for Waste Resource Management, Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Lavale, Pune, India. pooja.singh@scwrm.siu.edu.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4956-8644

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial biosurfactants are versatile biomolecules with potential to support sustainable chemistry and bio-based solutions for climate action. However, their use remains limited primarily owing to the complexities in their bioprocess. This review aims to evaluate current trends in biosurfactant research, with a special focus on artificial intelligence (AI)-based optimization techniques to clearly bring forth the qualitative research directions, the quantitative tools adopted, and most promising AI driven strategies for enhanced biosurfactant bioprocess. Systematic review revealed Artificial neural network, coupled to Response surface methodology, as the most extensively explored techniques till date, consistently delivering near accurate predictions in process optimization for biosurfactant production. Qualitative analysis suggested the potential of hybrid AI techniques with optimization algorithms to be most promising as they leverage the strength of both approaches. For the first time, this study integrates bibliometric analysis with AI-based review to provide a dual perspective on both research progression and technological innovations, with clear future research directions. Despite notable advancements, challenges such as limited datasets, model transferability, and microbial metabolic diversity persist. The study suggests that open-access, multi-dimensional datasets and hybrid AI models could significantly advance biosurfactant research and industrial scalability.

Indexed as

Artificial neural networkBioprospectingBiosurfactantGenetic algorithmMachine learningMedia optimization

Identifiers

PMID41307827
PMCPMC12753604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.