Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41307787›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2025

Efficacy and Safety of Retroclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Pain Management after Shoulder Surgeries: a Narrative Review.

Drake P Duplechin, Garrett T Folds, Audrey J De Witt, Shahab Ahmadzadeh, Edwin Herron, David W McGregor, Sahar Shekoohi, Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Alan D Kaye

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Drake P DuplechinSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Garrett T FoldsSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Audrey J De WittSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Shahab AhmadzadehDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Edwin HerronDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
David W McGregorDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Sahar ShekoohiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA. sahar.shekoohi@lsuhs.edu.
Alaa Abd-ElsayedDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Alan D KayeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPostoperative pain following shoulder surgeries, including rotator cuff repair and arthroplasty, can be severe and impede early mobilization, prolong recovery, and increase opioid consumption. Regional anesthesia has emerged as a cornerstone of multimodal pain management for these procedures, offering targeted analgesia with fewer systemic side effects. Among the various techniques, the retroclavicular approach to the brachial plexus, known as the retroclavicular brachial plexus block (RCB) or retroclavicular approach to the infraclavicular brachial plexus (RAPTIR), has gained attention for its promising efficacy and safety profile. This narrative review evaluates current evidence surrounding the retroclavicular block's clinical utility in postoperative shoulder pain control. We examine anatomical and technical considerations, analgesic efficacy, safety, and comparative advantages over traditional approaches such as the interscalene and supraclavicular blocks. RECENT

findingsLiterature suggests that RCB provides effective pain relief with reduced risk of phrenic nerve involvement and diaphragmatic paralysis, a critical advantage in patients with respiratory compromise. Additionally, its favorable ergonomic profile and improved needle visibility under ultrasound make it an appealing alternative in elective and emergent settings. The present investigation explores RCB's integration into multimodal analgesia protocols and applicability in obese and geriatric patients, highlighting current research's limitations. Although data remains limited, emerging evidence supports the retroclavicular block as a safe and effective option for shoulder analgesia, warranting further comparative studies and broader clinical adoption.

Indexed as

Brachial Plexus BlockPain ManagementPostoperative PainShoulderHumansTreatment OutcomeBrachial plexusPhrenic nervePostoperative analgesiaRAPTIR techniqueRegional anesthesiaRetroclavicular blockShoulder surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.