ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2025
Efficacy and Safety of Retroclavicular Brachial Plexus Block for Pain Management after Shoulder Surgeries: a Narrative Review.
Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewPostoperative pain following shoulder surgeries, including rotator cuff repair and arthroplasty, can be severe and impede early mobilization, prolong recovery, and increase opioid consumption. Regional anesthesia has emerged as a cornerstone of multimodal pain management for these procedures, offering targeted analgesia with fewer systemic side effects. Among the various techniques, the retroclavicular approach to the brachial plexus, known as the retroclavicular brachial plexus block (RCB) or retroclavicular approach to the infraclavicular brachial plexus (RAPTIR), has gained attention for its promising efficacy and safety profile. This narrative review evaluates current evidence surrounding the retroclavicular block's clinical utility in postoperative shoulder pain control. We examine anatomical and technical considerations, analgesic efficacy, safety, and comparative advantages over traditional approaches such as the interscalene and supraclavicular blocks. RECENT
findingsLiterature suggests that RCB provides effective pain relief with reduced risk of phrenic nerve involvement and diaphragmatic paralysis, a critical advantage in patients with respiratory compromise. Additionally, its favorable ergonomic profile and improved needle visibility under ultrasound make it an appealing alternative in elective and emergent settings. The present investigation explores RCB's integration into multimodal analgesia protocols and applicability in obese and geriatric patients, highlighting current research's limitations. Although data remains limited, emerging evidence supports the retroclavicular block as a safe and effective option for shoulder analgesia, warranting further comparative studies and broader clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41307787What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.