ArticleNeuroinformatics2025
Inferences on the Watts-Strogatz Model: A Study on Brain Functional Connectivity.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modelling real-world networks allows investigating the structure and the dynamics of such networks, which led to significant developments in various scientific fields. One of the most used models in these investigations is the Watts-Strogatz, with a structure composed of high clustering and short path lengths known as small-world networks. This model proposes an interesting gradient between regular and random networks, but its generating process, which relies on a single rewiring probability parameter, is hard to access and to manipulate. In order to study the mechanics of the Watts-Strogatz model, the present work proposes a new method based on deep neural networks that could estimate its probability p. To illustrate its applicability, neuroimaging and phenotypic resting-state fMRI data were used from patients with ADHD and typical development children, obtained from the ADHD-200 database. The neural network efficiently estimated the probability parameter, resulting in small-world graphs for functional brain connectivity with a mean ± s.e.m. p distribution of 0.804 ± 0.003. Despite no difference was found considering the gender or diagnosis of participants, the generalized linear model revealed age as a significant predictor of p (mean ± s.e.m.: 4.410 ± 0.877; p < 0.001), indicating a great effect of neurodevelopment on the brain network's structure. The proposed approach is promising in estimating the probability of the Watts-Strogatz model, and its application has the potential to improve investigations of network connectivity with a relatively efficient and simple framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41307783What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.