ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2025
Transforming Care in Congenital Heart Disease: The Role of Extended Reality in Family and Trainee Education and Procedural Planning.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computer-Based Simulation Technologies in Pediatric Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review of Applications and Outcomes.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bringing paediatric coronary artery abnormalities into view: the role of virtual reality.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Article
- Mixed Reality as a Tool for Congenital Heart Disease Case Management Discussions.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review examines the growing role of extended reality (XR) (including virtual, augmented, and mixed reality) in the care of patients with congenital heart disease (CHD), with a focus on its use in patient education, trainee instruction, and procedural planning. RECENT
findingsXR has demonstrated early success in improving patient and family understanding, enhancing trainee comprehension of cardiac anatomy, and aiding in surgical and transcatheter procedural planning for patients with complex cardiac anatomy. Studies demonstrate that XR improves visualization of 3D spatial relationships, increases confidence amongst providers and learners, and facilitates more informed preprocedural decision-making. XR addresses longstanding limitations of 2D imaging by providing interactive, patient-specific 3D environments. While most studies in this area are small and exploratory, they consistently underscore the clinical and educational value of XR in CHD care. XR is well-positioned to become a powerful tool across the continuum of CHD management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.