Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41307772›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2025

Indirect Defense Responses of Arabidopsis Thaliana To Insect Feeding Vibrations Utilizing a Miniature GC-FID.

Taylor Paret, Ronald V Emmons, Reginald Cocroft, Emanuela Gionfriddo, Heidi Appel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Taylor ParetDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, 3455 Cullen Blvd, Houston, TX, USA. typaret@cougarnet.uh.edu.
Ronald V EmmonsDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Toledo, 2801 West Bancroft St, Toledo, OH, USA.
Reginald CocroftDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, 612 Hitt St, Columbia, United States.
Emanuela GionfriddoDepartment of Chemistry, 710 Natural Sciences Complex, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Heidi AppelDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Houston, 3455 Cullen Blvd, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) plays a crucial role in plant-to-plant and plant-to-arthropod communication. Each blend of VOCs released carries a specific meaning for the receiving party and the stimulus that triggers a response. One such stimulus, vibrations from insect feeding, has been shown to elicit chemical defense responses in rosettes of Arabidopsis thaliana. In this study, we measured herbivore-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs) in response to 4 h of insect feeding vibrations using solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fibers in small collection chambers and a miniature Gas Chromatography-Flame Ionization Detection (GC-FID) system. The concentrations of Eugenol, β-caryophyllene, β-ionone, and MeSA increased within 4 h in response to insect feeding vibrations, indicating that these HIPVs are a sensitive response to this initial signal of herbivore attack.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisInsectaVibrationVolatile Organic CompoundsAnimalsChromatography, GasEugenolFeeding BehaviorHerbivoryPolycyclic SesquiterpenesSesquiterpenesSolid Phase MicroextractioncaryophylleneEugenolPolycyclic SesquiterpenesSesquiterpenesVolatile Organic CompoundsGC-FIDInsect feeding vibrationsPlant chemical defensesSPMEVolatile organic compounds

Identifiers

PMID41307772
PMCPMC12660393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.