ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025
Evaluating post-T-DXd treatment strategies in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Tucatinib, Trastuzumab, and Capecitabine in HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Portuguese Study.European journal of breast health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTrastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an antibody drug conjugate (ADC) approved for the treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Despite its efficacy, eventual resistance and disease progression are common, and no prospective studies exist to guide therapy in T-DXd-resistant HER2-positive MBC.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed patients with HER2-positive MBC who received cancer-directed therapies following treatment with T-DXd at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
resultsEighty-one eligible patients were identified, who received 199 lines of therapy collectively. Post-T-DXd therapies included other ADCs, chemotherapy, HER2-targeted antibodies, hormone-based therapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and clinical trials. The median overall survival (OS) after stopping T-DXd treatment was 19 months, with a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 3.7 months per subsequent treatment line. Chemotherapy was the most common treatment (42% of treatment lines; mPFS 3.4 months). No single therapeutic approach was clearly superior, although subsets of patients appeared to benefit from hormone therapy or TKIs. In a multivariate analysis including treatment type, treatment line, hormone receptor (HR) status, presence of brain metastases, and reason for T-DXd cessation, patients who discontinued T-DXd due to toxicity, rather than disease progression, had significantly better outcomes on subsequent therapy lines (HR 0.35; p < 0.001).
conclusionOur study indicates that patients emerge from T-DXd treatment with highly refractory disease. These findings highlight the urgent need for optimized treatment strategies and novel therapeutic options for this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.