ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2025
Radiation Exposure for Interventional Pain Management Physicians: A Review of Recent Literature.
Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewInterventional pain physicians are routinely exposed to radiation during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. With the commonplace use and utility of C-arm fluoroscopy, it has become increasingly important for physicians to maintain an understanding of the foundational principles and associated risks of radiation. This review highlights recent literature regarding radiation exposure to assist interventional pain physicians in their efforts to attenuate occupational risk. RECENT
findingsRecent studies continue to call attention to the importance of radiation safety awareness and adherence to established protective measures. The literature emphasizes variability in exposure based on technique, procedure type, and use of shielding. Safety protocols and the principles that guide these recommendations are reviewed, with attention to the ALARA principle, or keeping radiation exposure "as low as reasonably achievable." There are many variables that affect the amount of radiation a given provider is exposed to and numerous ways to limit dose and associated risk. The use of protective equipment, proper technique, and clinical instruction remain essential to reducing exposure. This review underscores the value of physician adherence to safety protocols and the continued need for research in the field of radiation safety and risk reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41307766What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.