ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2025
The impact of liver transection depth on surgical difficulty in robotic versus laparoscopic limited liver resection (TAKUMI-5).
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of robotic approach on total operating room time and surgical workflow in minimally invasive liver resection (TAKUMI-8).Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Robotic single-port versus multi-port distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a comparative analysis of the da Vinci™ SP and Xi systems.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAlthough robotic liver resection (RLR) has gained popularity worldwide, limited liver resection remains the mainstay of RLR. This study aimed to investigate the effect of parameters, including liver transection depth (LTD), on surgical difficulty in limited RLR compared with limited laparoscopic liver resection (LLR).
methodsThis retrospective study included 105 patients who underwent limited RLR (n = 56) or LLR (n = 49) at our institution between January 2018 and December 2024. After comparing outcomes of RLR and LLR, multivariate analyses were performed to examine effect of LTD on surgical difficulty (defined as prolonged operative time). Moreover, outcomes stratified by LTD cut-off values were compared between the groups.
resultsMedian LTD was similar between groups (RLR vs. LLR: 2.6 vs. 2.6 cm, P = 0.77). LTD was significantly correlated with operative time for both procedures (RLR, R² = 0.07, P = 0.042; LLR, R² = 0.08, P = 0.046). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that LLR (odds ratio, 6.9; P < 0.001) and LTD (odds ratio, 2.0; P = 0.004) were significant risk factors of surgical difficulty. Among patients with deeper LTD (> 2.5 cm), the RLR group had significantly shorter operative time (145 vs. 231 min, P < 0.001), less blood loss (nil vs. 100 mL, P = 0.006), and a higher rate of textbook outcomes (76.7% vs. 42.3%, P = 0.01).
conclusionThis study investigated impact of LTD on surgical outcomes in patients who underwent limited RLR compared to those who underwent limited LLR. LTD may be a useful parameter for estimating surgical difficulty in limited RLR. Moreover, robotic surgery may be favorable for deeper and limited liver resections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.