ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026
Theranostics and nuclear medicine practice in Asia-Pacific: an IAEA regional study.
Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uneven Global Distribution of Theranostics.World journal of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Preliminary volume-based optimization of radioactive iodine dose without radioactive iodine uptake in Graves' disease.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Asia-Pacific region, comprising more than half of the world's population, includes both developed and developing nations. Understanding the current status of nuclear medicine (NM) and theranostics in this dynamic region is essential for identifying strengths and weaknesses and for establishing a roadmap for future NM development both regionally and globally. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) conducted this survey to achieve these goals. Diverse data acquisition resources were employed to enroll eligible countries from the Asia-Pacific region. The NM staff per million population was calculated to assess the density for each NM specialty. Statistical analyses, including normality tests and the Mann‒Whitney U test, were performed via Stata version 17. Approximately 62% of the countries offer nuclear medicine services, mainly in Western Asia and Southeast Asia. Eastern Asian countries constitute more than two-thirds of all NM centers and cyclotrons in the region. Specifically, Japan also has the highest number of NMs, centers, and cyclotrons and SPECT density. Currently, only 30 countries provide radionuclide therapy and practice NM theranostics. Japan, Australia, Kuwait, and South Korea are among the countries with abundant NM staff per million people. Compared with developing countries, developed Asia-Pacific countries provide significantly more NM services (p value: 0.0001). The study reveals considerable variability among Asia-Pacific countries. Nearly half of the surveyed countries do not practice theranostics, and lack radiopharmacists. Building collaborations between model countries and those lacking NM services is crucial to enhancing theranostic practice and availability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.