ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Appendicolith detection in dual-energy CT of adult acute appendicitis: comparing portovenous phase and virtual noncontrast with true noncontrast images.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAppendicoliths are associated with failed nonoperative management in acute appendicitis and are used to exclude patients from this treatment. This study evaluated whether portovenous phase (PVP) and virtual noncontrast (VNC) images from rapid-kVP-switching dual-energy CT (rsDECT), alone or combined, can reliably detect appendicoliths using true noncontrast (TNC) images as the reference. Additional aims included identifying CT features of overlooked appendicoliths and those linked to complicated appendicitis.
methodsConsecutive adults with pathologically confirmed appendicitis who underwent preoperative rsDECT and appendectomy were retrospectively included. Two radiologists independently assessed PVP, VNC, PVP + VNC, and TNC images for appendicolith presence and number, with a third resolving discrepancies. Presence was classified as present or absent, and number into 1, 2 and > 2. Agreement with TNC was assessed using kappa statistics. Logistic regression identified predictors of overlooked appendicoliths and features associated with complicated appendicitis.
resultsAmong 203 patients; 71 (35%) had appendicoliths. PVP, VNC, and PVP + VNC showed substantial-to-almost-perfect agreement with TNC for detection (kappa = 0.805, 0.793, and 0.817, respectively; all p < 0.001) and substantial agreement for numbering (weighted kappa = 0.734, 0.706, and 0.734, respectively; all p < 0.001). Overlooked appendicoliths had smaller perimeters (OR 12.303; p = 0.003) and lower attenuation (OR 10.456; p = 0.004). In cases with appendicoliths, larger minimum length predicted complicated appendicitis (OR 16.756; p = 0.013).
conclusionsPVP and VNC from rsDECT sufficiently detected and numbered appendicoliths. Small, low attenuation appendicoliths were easily overlooked, while larger ones were linked to complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.