ArticleJournal of clinical monitoring and computing2026
Early prognosis prediction in mechanically ventilated patients using machine learning for tertiary care hospital settings.
Article in Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIntensive care units (ICUs) handle mechanically ventilated patients with life-threatening conditions, who require intensive monitoring and treatment. In a low physician-patient ratio setting, providing consistent care to all patients is challenging. A survival prediction model using machine-learning can potentially improve prognosis evaluation and resource allocation. This study aims to develop a machine-learning model to predict survival/mortality in mechanically ventilated patients using clinical features recorded at the time of ICU admission and compare its performance with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score as a standalone predictor.
methodsA dataset consisting of 660 mechanically ventilated patients and 98 clinical parameters (n = 660, Male: Female = 365:295, Age = 44.45 ± 19.36 years) from three ICUs at AIIMS, Delhi, was retrospectively evaluated after institutional ethical approval. Binary classification models were trained using 10-fold cross-validation with 70% data and 30% reserved for testing. The outcome was based on the survival/death of the patient during their ICU stay.
resultsA total of 39 features were selected using Shapley-Additive-Explanations (SHAP) and Random Forest model. The top three features were SOFA score, International normalized ratio (INR) and respiratory rate with feature importance values of 7.3%, 4.5% and 3.4% respectively. The K-nearest-neighbour (KNN) model using SHAP-selected features achieved the best test performance with an accuracy = 0.80, area-under-receiver-operating-characteristics-curve (AUROC) = 0.84, sensitivity = 0.82, specificity = 0.77, positive-predictive-value (PPV) = 0.78 and negative-predictive-value (NPV) = 0.82, compared to the SOFA-only model showing accuracy = 0.73, AUROC = 0.73, sensitivity = 0.82, specificity = 0.63, PPV = 0.69 and NPV = 0.78.
conclusionThe automated machine-learning method for prognosis prediction may assist clinicians in the early triage of patients. These models may offer valuable support to ICU physicians for timely alerts and informed clinical judgment. The study also highlights the continued utility of the SOFA score used by clinicians as the first assessment tool in ICUs, while suggesting that carefully developed machine-learning models may offer complementary support in high-risk ICU settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41307642What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.