ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2025
Practice Patterns of Physicians Who Perform Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections.
Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Image-guided plexus and peripheral nerve blocks in modern multimodal pain management].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- [Percutaneous therapy for back pain : Epidural and perifacet therapies].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injection Approaches: A Practical Overview for Trainees.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
- Physician Perceptions of Particulate Versus Non-Particulate Steroids in Epidural Steroid Injections.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
- The Infraneural Approach to Lumbar Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections: A Practical Review for Trainees and Interventionalists.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewLumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs) are a widely used interventional procedure for managing lumbosacral radicular pain and other spinal conditions. TFESIs help reduce inflammation and enhance function by delivering corticosteroids into the nerve root and epidural space. The transforaminal approach is commonly utilized for its precise targeting, offering both diagnostic and therapeutic benefits. Furthermore, this technique can be performed in patients with a history of laminectomy or contraindications to performing an interlaminar approach at the targeted levels. This study reviews current practice patterns, technical preferences, and procedural experiences of interventional pain physicians performing lumbar TFESIs. RECENT
findingsA survey was distributed to interventional pain physicians via email, web links, and social media platforms. Respondents included academic physicians in ACGME-accredited fellowship programs, as well as hospital-based and private practice physicians. The survey contained questions focusing on fluoroscopic views used for TFESIs, frequency of one-level versus two-level injections, and the occurrence of paresthesias during lumbar TFESIs. Data were collected anonymously, and descriptive statistics were used to analyze responses. A total of 87 respondents completed the survey. For fluoroscopic guidance, 60.9% (53/87) preferred using a combination of AP, oblique, and lateral views. Regarding injection levels, 63.2% (55/87) reported sometimes performing two-level injections, while 27.6% (24/87) always performed two levels, and 9.2% (8/87) exclusively performed one-level injections. The frequency of paresthesia during TFESIs varied, with 73.6% (64/87) reporting paresthesia occurring sometimes, 18.4% (16/87) reporting it most of the time, and 6.9% (6/87) stating it never occurred. This study highlights diverse practice patterns among interventional pain physicians performing lumbar TFESIs. Most physicians prefer multi-view fluoroscopic guidance and adapt the number of injection levels based on clinical need. Paresthesia during TFESIs is commonly reported but varies in frequency. These findings provide preliminary insights into procedural techniques and decision-making in lumbar TFESIs, offering a foundation for future research to refine best practices and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41307623What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.