ArticleJournal of community health2026
An Mpox 2024 Survey of Health Sciences Students in India and Bangladesh.
Article in Journal of community health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) for the multinational outbreak of mpox in 2024, due to clade I Monkeypox virus (MPXV). Our team conducted a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study to investigate the knowledge and attitudes of 902 health science students (who were studying dentistry, physiotherapy, pharmacy, or nursing) in India and Bangladesh. The mean knowledge and attitude scores were 14.4 ± 3.6 and 7.7 ± 1.9, respectively. Despite high (> 85%) awareness of Mpox outbreaks and cognizance of the declaration of PHEIC, noteworthy misconceptions were also noticed: 55.9% thought that MPXV infection could be treated with antibiotics, and there was an increased case fatality estimation. Approximately 91% of students preferred post-infection isolation and relied on vaccination. Nearly three-fourths of them were concerned about the pandemic potential of MPXV. Based on the multivariable models, we found that students ≥ 26 years of age (β = 2.23; 95% CI 0.97-3.50) and those with prior information-seeking behavior through Google, ChatGPT, etc. (β = 1.46; 0.97-1.96) independently predicted higher knowledge. These patterns were also observed for attitudes (β = 0.84, 0.23-1.45). Interns/residents showed better scores, while third-year students displayed lower knowledge (β = -1.42; -2.75 to - 0.09). These findings show that there is scope for readiness, but there are gaps in therapeutic and risk management. This study underscores the need for incremental activities to augment digital and curricular literacy for combating public health emergencies in low-resource academic milieu.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41307619What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.