Trial reportJournal of patient-reported outcomes2025
Psychometric validation and meaningful change thresholds of the Skindex-10 questionnaire and 5-D Itch scale for assessing itch in patients with chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus.
Trial report in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Skindex-10 questionnaire and 5-D Itch scale are patient-reported outcome measures used to evaluate the itch intensity and impact of chronic pruritus on patients’ quality of life (QoL). These measures may be appropriate for evaluating the efficacy of anti-pruritic treatment in patients with chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP). This study evaluated the psychometric validity and meaningful within-patient change (MWPC) thresholds of these two measures in patients with moderate-to-severe CKD-aP undergoing hemodialysis. METHODOLOGY: Content validity interviews for the Skindex-10 were conducted in 23 patients. Psychometric properties of the Skindex-10 questionnaire and 5-D Itch scale were assessed using data collected from a phase 2 randomized controlled trial of an anti-pruritic treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe CKD-aP. As part of the trial, the patients (N = 174) had completed the Skindex-10 and 5-D Itch measures at baseline (Day 1, pre-treatment); Weeks 2, 4, 6; and end of treatment (Week 8). Anchor-based methods were used to determine MWPC score thresholds, which were verified in two very similar, larger phase 3 cohorts (N = 378 and N = 471).
resultsContent validity interview participants considered the Skindex-10 questionnaire to be straightforward, relevant, and comprehensive. Scores from both measures showed moderate-to-strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s α ≥ 0.74), and moderate test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients ≥ 0.67, Week 2 vs. Week 4) for patients stable on the similar Patient Global Impression of Worst Itch Severity measure. Construct validity analyses indicated that total scores and most domains of the Skindex-10 and 5-D Itch significantly correlated with other measures of itch. Skindex-10 and 5-D Itch total scores were also significantly different (P ≤ 0.0015) between distinct groups created based on conceptually related pruritus measures (known-groups validity). Anchor-based analyses indicated that a reduction from baseline of ≥ 15 points on the 0–60 scale for Skindex-10 total score, and of ≥ 5 points on the 5–25 scale for 5-D Itch total score, represented appropriate clinically meaningful within-patient changes.
conclusionsThe Skindex-10 and 5-D Itch showed good psychometric properties for measuring itch intensity and health-related quality of life in patients with moderate-to-severe CKD-aP. These results support their use in evaluating treatment efficacy in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.