ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025
Online peer support program for women with metastatic cancer: a pre-post evaluation.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe diagnosis of metastatic cancer entails an enormous psychological, physical, and social burden, whereby affected women do not feel adequately supported. To address this issue, the Women's Self-Help Organization Cancer (Frauenselbsthilfe Krebs e.V. FSH) has implemented an innovative peer support program based on online group meetings moderated by trained peers to positively influence psychosocial distress and quality of life of affected women. This pre-post non-randomized study aims to systematically evaluate this program.
methodsParticipants were asked to evaluate the program in terms of expectations and concerns regarding the program, as well as experienced benefits and difficulties. We measured various psychosocial outcomes including psychosocial distress and quality of life at baseline (T0) before the program and after 6 months (T1) follow-up.
resultsWe included n = 97 patients (mostly metastatic breast cancer) at T0 and n = 44 patients with matching complete data sets at T1. The results showed that the program met the participants' expectations. The online meetings were rated as helpful in terms of sharing experiences and feeling less alone. While participants initially expressed concern about confronting others' fates (T0), this worry diminished after participation (T1). With respect to the identification of potential effects, we found a significant reduction in psychosocial stress (t (43) = 3.41, p = .001), whereas the levels of depression and anxiety remained unchanged.
conclusionThis online support program showed substantial benefits for the participants. For the next step, a controlled study should be performed to prove the effectiveness of this online program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.