Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41307557›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health (Oxford, England)2026

Barriers to sickle cell disease care: a biopsychosocial analysis mapped to the standards of care guidelines by the sickle pan African research consortium.

Nchangwi Syntia Munung, Vhuthu Raphunga, Achuma Mashalaba, Arthemon Nguweneza, Kambe Banda, Vivian Paintsil, Obiageli E Nnodu, Ambroise Wonkam

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nchangwi Syntia MunungDivision of Human Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road Observatory, Cape Town 7701, Western Cape, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1498-3602
Vhuthu RaphungaDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town 7701, Western Cape, South Africa.
Achuma MashalabaDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town 7701, Western Cape, South Africa.
Arthemon NguwenezaDivision of Human Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road Observatory, Cape Town 7701, Western Cape, South Africa.
Kambe BandaDivision of Human Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road Observatory, Cape Town 7701, Western Cape, South Africa.
Vivian PaintsilDepartment of Child Health, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi-Ejisu Road, P.O. Box 1934, Kumasi, Ghana.
Obiageli E NnoduCentre of Excellence for Sickle Cell Disease Research and Training (CESRTA), University of Abuja, Gwagwalada, Abuja 902001, Federal Capital Territory, Nigeria.
Ambroise WonkamDivision of Human Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road Observatory, Cape Town 7701, Western Cape, South Africa.

Funding

Public Understanding of Big data in Genomics Medicine in Africa (PUBGEM-Africa)U01MH127692 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN · PI MUNUNG, NCHANGWI SYNTIA, WONKAM, AMBROISE · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHSNIMH NIH HHS U01MH127692Sickle Africa Data Coordinating Centre U01HL157004Sickle Africa Data Coordinating Centre UO1HL156942U.S. National Institutes of HealthUS National Institutes of Health U24HL135600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe SickleInAfrica consortium has developed multi-level Standards of Care (SoC) guidelines for SCD spanning primary, secondary, and tertiary services. However, their successful implementation may be hindered by health system limitations, patient-level factors, and social determinants of health.

objectivesTo identify and categorise barriers to SCD care using the biopsychosocial framework and map the barriers to the SoC guidelines developed by the Sickle Pan-African Research Consortium (SPARCo). The goal was to identify public health, clinical, programmatic and research priorities for SCD care in Africa.

methodsA scoping review was conducted to identify barriers to SCD care. The identified barriers were categorised into biopsychosocial domains and mapped to the SPARCo SoC guidelines.

resultsFifty-four studies were included in the scoping review. Social barriers were the most frequent (85.2%), followed by operational (74.1%), psychological (40.7%), and biological (14.8%). Common barriers included the invisible nature of pain, medication stockouts, negative attitudes from clinical staff; inadequate mental health support; stigma, and low SCD literacy among healthcare workers. Most barriers clustered around three SPARCO SoC domains: health maintenance and preventive therapy, management of acute complications, and specialised protocols. Suggested priorities include integrating SCD care into existing vertical programmes, co-designing paediatric-to-adult care transition models with patient support groups, and workforce training.

conclusionLeveraging existing, well established vertical programmes in healthcare systems, such as maternal health, immunisation and counselling services, could be a pragmatic pathway to scale up SCD services and minimising barriers to the implementation of the SPARCo SoC.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellHealth Services AccessibilityPractice Guidelines as TopicStandard of CareAfricaHumansSocial Determinants of HealthAfricabarriers to caresickle cell diseaseSickleInAfricaSPARCostandards of care

Identifiers

PMID41307557
PMCPMC13017619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.