ReviewThe Journal of general virology2025
Emerging technologies for in-field plant virus detection: innovations and future directions.
Review in The Journal of general virology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant virus infections pose a substantial threat to crop quality and productivity, contributing to considerable economic losses in global agriculture annually. Traditionally, laboratories have widely adopted serological techniques, such as ELISA, and molecular methods, including quantitative PCR, for virus diagnostics. More recently, sophisticated next-generation sequencing approaches have been introduced to improve the efficiency and reliability of virus detection and identification. However, the development of sensitive, rapid and low-cost methods for the on-site detection, quantification and identification of plant viruses remains an ongoing challenge and is still in its early days. Point-of-care technologies have not fully realized their potential in agriculture due to numerous challenges, such as the elevated cost of development, lack of standardized validation and insufficient field testing. Therefore, future success depends on addressing these technical, economic and regulatory hurdles, as well as considering the specific user needs within the agricultural context. In this mini-review, recent advancements in biosensing for on-site plant virus monitoring, involving nanotechnology-based sensors, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated (Cas) systems, electrochemical and modern field-effect transistor-based sensors offering high sensitivity, speed and portability, are discussed. These technologies, when integrated with smartphone applications and/or machine learning modules, could enable real-time, field-deployable diagnostics for early disease management and sustainable agriculture. The aim is to raise awareness among plant virologists about this panel of emerging diagnostic concepts that could help improve current methods, ultimately facilitating the management of plant viral diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.