Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41307347›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care2026

Core outcome sets and trials of nutrition and metabolism interventions.

Annika Reintam Blaser, Thomas Davies, Kaspar F Bachmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Annika Reintam BlaserDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Lucerne Cantonal Hospital, Lucerne.
Thomas DaviesWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London.
Kaspar F BachmannDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe target of critical care nutrition research is moving from short-term physiological surrogate endpoints and mortality toward long-term patient-centered outcomes. This review summarizes recent core outcome set (COS) initiatives relevant to nutrition and metabolism and outcome selection in recent trials. RECENT

findingsThe Core Outcome Measures for Clinical Effectiveness Trials of Nutritional and Metabolic Interventions in Critical Illness (CONCISE) defined essential outcomes: survival, physical function, infection, activities of daily living, nutritional status, and muscle/nerve function to be assessed at 30 and 90 days after randomization, with suggested but nonmandated instruments to preserve feasibility. COSMOGI (core outcome set of daily monitoring of gastrointestinal function in critically ill patients) standardizes daily gastrointestinal monitoring during critical illness. Large, randomized trials testing higher protein or early aggressive energy delivery have not improved survival and functional recovery, although the latter has only recently received more attention. From a mechanistic perspective, outcome selection in critical care nutrition and gastrointestinal function research should prioritize patient-centered (i.e. functional and patient-reported) outcomes. SUMMARY: Standardizing outcome selection should improve interpretability and evidence synthesis. Future trials should incorporate robust functional and patient-reported outcomes. Core outcome sets will need updates when new assessment tools (i.e., biomarkers, new functional tests, standardized ultrasound protocols) emerge.

Indexed as

Critical CareCritical IllnessNutrition TherapyOutcome Assessment, Health CareHumansNutritional StatusRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicbiomarkerscore outcome setscritical care nutritionphysical functionpostintensive care syndrome

Identifiers

PMID41307347
PMCPMC12893168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.