Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41307328›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical psychology2026

Sense-Making and Gratitude in the Aftermath of Hurricane Helene.

Noah F Britt, Robin M Kowalski, Cora Dodson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Noah F BrittClemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA.
Robin M KowalskiClemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9667-3116
Cora DodsonClemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEarly on the morning of September 27, 2024, Hurricane Helene roared through the Southeastern United States, leaving a trail of devastation to be followed by a recovery period that will last months, and, in some places, even years. The purpose of the current study was to analyze the extent to which online posts in response to a well-being prompt yielded positive affective responses despite the magnitude of the crisis. METHOD AND

resultsOne week and 2 weeks after the hurricane, a local news agency prompted followers on Facebook to respond with how they were coping. BERTopic modeling conducted on 1941 Facebook comments in response to the first prompt resulted in 25 non-noise topics. In the first sample (1 week after the Hurricane), the largest topic, centering around lack of power, contained 277 comments. The smallest topic, centering around the lack of Internet access, contained 11 relevant comments. Three categories generated from these topics were labeled "Outages" (702 comments), "Gratitude" (352 comments), and "Physical Recovery and Response" (257 comments). In the second sample (2 weeks after the Hurricane), the largest topic centered around gratitude and contained 30 comments. Outages again represented the largest category, with 67 comments, followed by gratitude with 57 comments. Sentiment analysis showed that gratitude had the highest sentiment with sentiment ratings increasing with the second sample. Significant differences by gender were not observed.

conclusionThese results show that people can experience significant life upheaval and potentially catastrophic loss and still find joy and gratitude. Focusing on factors where people still hold power, such as gratitude for being alive and for community support, allows people to reframe tragedy into an opportunity for growth.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalCyclonic StormsDisastersSocial MediaAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSoutheastern United Statesbenefit‐findinggratitudenatural disasterssense‐making

Identifiers

PMID41307328
PMCPMC12882798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.