ArticleClinical and translational science2025
Multi-Gene Pharmacogenomic Testing in a Community-Based Setting Is Feasible and Reduces Total Healthcare Costs.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost and utilization outcomes of pharmacist-led medication therapy optimization in a Medicare ACO population.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- The Environmental and Global Impact of Pharmacogenomics: Advancing Green Pharmacy Toward Sustainable and Inclusive Precision Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Multi-Gene Pharmacogenomic Testing in a Community-Based Setting Is Feasible and Reduces Total Healthcare Costs.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing using multi-gene panels (mgPGx) is documented to improve clinical outcomes; however, real-world data on its economic impact remain limited. This study aimed to evaluate the utility and economic value of mgPGx testing among Medicare patients within a community-based health system. We identified Medicare Advantage patients within the primary care setting of a community-based health system hospital who were taking ≥ 1 PGx-guided medication using a stratification algorithm. In total, 1042 patients participated in mgPGx testing. We evaluated the prevalence of PGx medications, polypharmacy involving PGx medications, and actionable results (i.e., a phenotype with PGx guidance and a relevant PGx medication). A Total Cost of Care (TCOC) analysis was performed for a subset of patients (n = 548) who underwent PGx testing and were matched to a control group that did not undergo PGx testing using propensity score matching. Total medical expenses over 12 months, both before and after testing, were compared. Forty-four percent (n = 454/1042) of patients were ≥ 3 PGx-guided medications. Over one-third of patients who were on ≥ 3 PGx medications had ≥ 2 actionable results (35.5%, n = 161/454). The TCOC analysis demonstrated a trend toward a net cost savings of $1827 per member per year (PMPY), with $1582 in medical savings and $245 in pharmacy savings. Polypharmacy with PGx medications is prevalent, and mgPGx led to cost savings. Further research with a larger sample size is needed to replicate the results and assess the long-term impact on healthcare utilization and costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.